I just received one of my regular update emails from the UK CIPR and it included a link to a speech by the president Lionel Zetter, about lobbying and democracy. He makes the highly laudable point that dictators have no need for PR - only publicists and spin doctors (which compares interestingly with his thoughts on the evolution of PR in China). I'm not calling him inconsistent because there's a nice point about which side you're working on...
When I was at Marconi, and we were downsizing aggressively in an attempt to stay afloat I was called Dr Goebbels on several occasions (and not just at home). I'm very certain that our communications with staff were always honest and ethical and as candid as the law and stock market rules allowed. And recently I had a call from a contact whose employer had made the headlines for announcing redundancies just months after giving staff strong reassurance to the contrary - I certainly didn't think that she was dishonest and she was clearly very upset about the fate of her colleagues.
But at what point does the IC manager stand up and say "I just won't be part of what you're doing...". If it's not illegal should that be your acid test? What about when the organisation is lacking in candour? But there are always going to be times when telling the whole story is not possible or simply not a good idea.
True, there are clear-cut situations. If you worked at Enron and discovered the truth you'd have had a bit of a tussle with your conscience and I'm not sure how long I'd be able to justify to staff an investment strategy that involved Apartheid South Africa - you can only spin the old 'working for change from within' line for so long.
However, it's a toughie. Anyone who's read Sebastian Faulks' Charlotte Gray, will know how it goes...collaboration with the dark side begins with little, seemingly harmless decisions and ends with horrible consequences.
I had a lovely meeting this afternoon with someone who said she wanted to 'make a difference' and had left corporate life to make time to do work that contributed to society. Not all of us have the courage to take this step - mortgages, children and the need for faster, shinier bicycles stop many of us fulfilling our desire to do good.
But once upon a time doctors took an oath which included the promise to do no harm. Shouldn't we include something like that in our work?
Liam







Recent Comments