Sue mentioned that we've just come back from running one of our corporate Black Belt sessions in Europe.
For a Brit, it's always interesting to meet communicators from the rest of Europe where the role of the worker representative and the works council is so much stronger. As an old leftie (I might have even joined a trotskyite group at university except they expected you to get up early to sell newspapers outside factories) it's particularly noteworthy.
And in the UK, on one of our recent Black Belts, we had someone who's life was dominated by union relations and in Europe workers are having ever greater formal role in the planning of a business. I generally think this is a GOOD THING. In recent years the markets have not really done much to restrain some of the worst corporate excesses and the supremacy of the shareholder in most corporate thinking may not always lend itself to the most responsible or accountable decision-making.
But the challenge comes to internal communicators. A union communication is always going to be quicker, blunter and more trustworthy than anything that comes from the employer. When I did some work a few years back for a trade union it was amazing how swifty they could react - well before the management side had decided what to say, had it watered down by the legal team and filtered through corporate-speak.
Which all makes me wonder how British internal communicators will cope with the growing implementation of an European model of industrial relations. In the UK, the 1980's and 90's saw the gradual disappearance of union influence except in a few notable places - but is the growing role of employee representatives changing the Internal Communicator's job?
About a year ago you couldn't move in the UK for dire warnings that the much delayed roll-out of the European DIrective on Consultation and Information was going to bring the end of the world as we knew it. It would be interesting to know what really changed????
Liam







Recent Comments